PKP
reading research basis
PKP
PowerPhonics research basis
Documentation of the Scientifically-Based
Reading Research forPowerKids Press books for grades K – 5
The Theory and Research Behind PowerKids Press
The pedagogic
theory behind PowerKids Press is supported by the findings of the
National Research Council (NRC) Committee on Preventing Reading
Difficulties in Young Children (Snow, Burns, & Griffin, 1998)
and the National Reading Panel Report Teaching Children to Read:
An Evidence-Based Assessment of the Scientific Research Literature
on Reading and Its Implications for Reading Instruction (Langenberg,
et al, 2000), which confirm that five of the critical components
for skilled reading include phonemic awareness, phonics instruction,
fluency, vocabulary, and comprehension.
PowerKids Press
incorporates all of these elements, and take reading instruction
a step further by placing each of these skills within the context
of leveled nonfiction readers, an approach called for in Text Matters
in Learning to Read (Hiebert, 1998), and supported by the research
featured in the articles Trying Something New: Meaning-based Reading
Instruction in a Finnish First-Grade Classroom (Korkeamäki,
1996) and The Scarcity of Informational Texts in First Grade (Duke,
1999). The content of these nonfiction books is correlated directly
to the national standards for social studies, science, and math
curricula for grades K – 4. We believe that reading instruction
administered through the use of nonfiction text that is correlated
to the curricula gives young children an excellent basis from which
to become successful, fluent readers.
Each book contains
ample opportunities for phonemic awareness and phonics instruction.
Studies such as those featured in Sources of individual differences
in reading acquisition (Share, et al, 1984) show that phonemic awareness
is one of the two best predictors of how well children will learn
to read. An emerging reader with a high level of phonemic awareness
is better positioned to decode unfamiliar words (Ehri, 1991, 1994),
a necessary skill when dealing with informational text. There is
a heavy emphasis on acquiring new vocabulary at these early levels,
and indeed at each subsequent level.
Fluency and
comprehension are also critical components of skilled reading. Per
the findings of Fountas & Pinnell (1996), these feature close
picture/text correlation; a combination of site words, high-frequency
words, and new words; and subject matter that is of interest to
the reader. By doing so, PowerKids Press books are effective in
helping children learn to read fluently, that is to say with speed,
accuracy, and proper expression. Comprehension skills are enforced
simply by the nature of the subject matter of the books, which correlates
directly to what the child is learning in the classroom.
How
Do PowerKids Press Books Work?
We understand
that teachers are encouraged to spend a majority of their time on
reading instruction in addition to the other subjects dictated by
national curriculum standards. As such, we have closely correlated
the text in PowerKids Press books to the social studies, science,
and math curricula for grades K – 4, giving teachers the ability
to reinforce critical reading skills, such as phonemic awareness,
phonics instruction, vocabulary, fluency, and reading comprehension,
while introducing young students to a variety of informational content.
Because the content is closely tied to the curriculum, children
are encouraged to read fluently and for comprehension. As their
reading skills grow, so does their knowledge of a subject and their
vocabulary.
Evaluation-Based
Evidence of Effectiveness
PowerKids Press
books have been used effectively in schools around the country for
more than seven years. Pre- and post-tests results reveal the striking
effectiveness of this program.
Support
for the Methodology Behind PowerKids Press
See attached
References
Adams, M.J.
(1990) Beginning to read: Thinking and Learning about print. Cambridge,
MA: MIT Press.
Chall, J. (1967) Learning to read: the great debate. New York: McGraw
Hill.
Dreher, M.J.
& Korkeamäki, R-L. (1996) “Trying Something new:
Meaning-Based Research Instruction in a Finnish First-Grade Classroom.”
Journal of Literacy Research (Vol. 28, pp. 9–34)
Duke, N.K. (1999)
“The Scarcity of Informational Texts in First Grade.”
Center for the Improvement of Early Reading Achievement (CIERA)
report # 1-007.
Ehri, L. (1994)
Development of the ability to read words: Update. In R. Ruddell,
M Ruddell & H. Singer (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes
of reading (4th ed., pp. 323–358). Newark, DE: International
Reading Association.
Ibid. (1991)
Development of the ability to read words. In R. Barr, M.L. Kamil,
P. Mosenthal, & P.D. Pearson (Eds.) Handbook of reading research
(Vol. 2, pp. 383, 417). New York: Longman.
Fountas, I.
& Pinnell, G.S. (1996) Guided Reading: Good first teaching for
all children, Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Hiebert, E.
(1998) “Text Matters in Learning to Read.” Center for
the Improvement of Early Reading Achievement (CIERA) report # 1-001.
Hoffman, J.,
Roser, N., Salas, R., Patterson, E. & Pennington, J. (2000)
“Text Leveling and Little Books in First-Grade Reading.”
Center for the Improvement of Early Reading Achievement (CIERA)
report # 1-0010.
Langenberg,
D., Correro, G., Ehri, L., Ferguson, G., Garza, N., Kamil, M., Marrett,
C. B., Samuels, S. J., Shanahan, T., Shaywitz, S., Trabasso, T.,
Williams, J., Willows, D. & Yatvin, J. (Panel) (2000). “Teaching
Children to Read: An Evidence-Based Assessment of the Scientific
Research Literature on Reading and Its Implications for Reading
Instruction”. Washington, DC: National Institute of Child
Health and Human Development.
Share, D., Jorm,
A. Maclean, R. & Matthews, R. (1984) Sources of individual difference
in reading acquisition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 1309–1324.
Snow, C. Burns,
M. & Griffin, P. (Eds.) (1998). “Preventing reading difficulties
in young children.” Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Vaaca, R., Pikulski,
J. Ransom, K., & Farstrup, A., (1997) The Role of Phonics in
Reading Instruction. Newark, DE, International Reading Association.
Back
to Top
Documentation of the Scientifically-Based
Reading Research forPowerPhonics
The Theory and Research Behind PowerPhonics
The pedagogic
theory behind PowerPhonics is based on the findings of the National
Research Council (NRC) Committee on Preventing Reading Difficulties
in Young Children (Snow, Burns, & Griffin, 1998) and the National
Reading Panel Report Teaching Children to Read: An Evidence-Based
Assessment of the Scientific Research Literature on Reading and
Its Implications for Reading Instruction (Langenberg, et al, 2000),
which state, in part, that phonemic awareness is a critical component
in teaching children to read.
Supported by
hundreds of studies, this theory is neither new nor untried. However,
PowerPhonics takes phonics instruction a step further by placing
phonics skills within the context of leveled nonfiction readers,
an approach called for in Text Matters in Learning to Read (Hiebert,
1998), supported by the research featured in the articles Trying
Something New: Meaning-based Reading Instruction in a Finnish First-Grade
Classroom (Korkeamäki, 1996) and The Scarcity of Informational
Texts in First Grade (Duke, 1999), and by the 1997 position statement
issued by the International Reading Association The Role of Phonics
in Reading Instruction. Our target audience is pre-K to 1, the group
for whom phonics instruction has proven to be most effective (Adams,
1990; Chall, 1967).
Other studies,
such as those featured in Sources of individual differences in reading
acquisition (Share, et al, 1984) show that phonemic awareness and
letter knowledge are the two best predictors of how well children
will learn to read. We believe that phonics-skills instruction administered
through the use of nonfiction text that is correlated to the curricula
gives young children an excellent basis from which to become successful,
fluent readers. An emerging reader with a high level of phonemic
awareness is better positioned to decode unfamiliar words (Ehri,
1991, 1994), a necessary skill when dealing with informational text.
Per the findings of Fountas & Pinnell (1996), the books in PowerPhonics
feature close picture/text correlation; a combination of site words,
high-frequency words, and new words; an increasing level of text
difficulty corresponding to the acquisition of phonics skills; and
subject matter that is of interest to the reader.
How
Does PowerPhonics Work?
We understand
that teachers are encouraged to spend a majority of their time on
reading instruction in addition to the other subjects dictated by
national curriculum standards. As such, we have closely correlated
the text in PowerPhonics to the social studies and science curricula
for grades pre-K to 2, giving teachers the ability to reinforce
critical reading skills, such as phonemic awareness, while introducing
young students to a variety of informational contents. Because the
content is closely tied to the curriculum, children are encouraged
to read fluently and for comprehension. As their phonics skills
grow, so does their knowledge of a subject and their vocabulary.
By providing
coherent, skills-based reading instruction, PowerPhonics gives children
a solid foundation on which to build and strengthen reading skills
in five critical areas: phonemic awareness, phonics/decoding, fluency,
vocabulary, and construction of meaning.
PowerPhonics
is divided into three skill sets of increasing difficulty. Within
each skill set there are 18 titles. Each title features one phonics
skill, which is consistent with the results of the 2000 NRP study
showing that instruction focusing on one or two phonics skills has
a larger effect on the ability to read than does a multi-skill approach.
- Skill Set
I
Beginning consonant sounds
Short vowel sounds
- Skill Set
II
Beginning consonant sounds
Long vowel sounds
Consonant digraphs (wh, ch, th, sh)
Initial consonant blends (bl, fl)
- Skill Set
III
Initial consonant blends (cl, pl, sl, gl, br, tr, gr, fr, dr,
cr)
Vowel digraphs (ea, oa, ai)
R-controlled vowels (ar, er, ir, or, ur)
The comprehensive
Teacher’s Guide walks teachers through the systematic instruction
of phonics skills in the context of informational text correlated
to the national standards for Pre-K – 2 social studies and
science curricula.
The Teacher’s
Guide assists teachers in creating lesson plans featuring the following
tasks, all of which are commonly used to improve children’s
phonemic awareness (NRP, 2000): phoneme isolation, phoneme identity,
phoneme categorization, phoneme blending, phoneme segmentation,
and phoneme deletion. Each lesson plan also enforces vocabulary,
both familiar and unfamiliar, and presents activities to encourage
comprehension of the text and integration of the children’s
newly acquired knowledge into the rest of the curriculum. A writing
component reinforces letter knowledge, another key element in acquiring
reading skills (Share, et al, 1984).
Evaluation-Based
Evidence of Effectiveness
Three years
in the making, PowerPhonics has been available for purchase since
September 2001, and is currently being used effectively in schools
around the country. Pre- and post-tests results reveal the striking
effectiveness of this program.
Support
for the Methodology Behind PowerPhonics
See attached
References
Adams, M.J.
(1990) Beginning to read: Thinking and Learning about print. Cambridge,
MA: MIT Press.
Chall, J. (1967)
Learning to read: the great debate. New York: McGraw Hill.
Dreher, M.J.
& Korkeamäki, R-L. (1996) “Trying Something new:
Meaning-Based Research Instruction in a Finnish First-Grade Classroom.”
Journal of Literacy Research (Vol. 28, pp. 9–34)
Duke, N.K. (1999)
“The Scarcity of Informational Texts in First Grade.”
Center for the Improvement of Early Reading Achievement (CIERA)
report # 1-007.
Ehri, L. (1994)
Development of the ability to read words: Update. In R. Ruddell,
M Ruddell & H. Singer (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes
of reading (4th ed., pp. 323–358). Newark, DE: International
Reading Association.
Ibid. (1991)
Development of the ability to read words. In R. Barr, M.L. Kamil,
P. Mosenthal, & P.D. Pearson (Eds.) Handbook of reading research
(Vol. 2, pp. 383, 417). New York: Longman.
Fountas, I.
& Pinnell, G.S. (1996) Guided Reading: Good first teaching for
all children, Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Hiebert, E.
(1998) “Text Matters in Learning to Read.” Center for
the Improvement of Early Reading Achievement (CIERA) report # 1-001.
Langenberg,
D., Correro, G., Ehri, L., Ferguson, G., Garza, N., Kamil, M., Marrett,
C. B., Samuels, S. J., Shanahan, T., Shaywitz, S., Trabasso, T.,
Williams, J., Willows, D. & Yatvin, J. (Panel) (2000). “Teaching
Children to Read: An Evidence-Based Assessment of the Scientific
Research Literature on Reading and Its Implications for Reading
Instruction”. Washington, DC: National Institute of Child
Health and Human Development.
Share, D., Jorm,
A. Maclean, R. & Matthews, R. (1984) Sources of individual difference
in reading acquisition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 1309–1324.
Snow, C. Burns,
M. & Griffin, P. (Eds.) (1998). “Preventing reading difficulties
in young children.” Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Vaaca, R., Pikulski,
J. Ransom, K., & Farstrup, A., (1997) The Role of Phonics in
Reading Instruction. Newark, DE, International Reading Association.
Back
to Top